Payacuca Nicaragua - Porvenir Project
In general – the proposal is reasonable in its description, but there are many missing issues that need to be addressed before any financing should be committed. See below (issues are not in any particular order of importance):
Water Quality - Other than a brief description of the current source, th...
Payacuca Nicaragua - Porvenir Project
In general – the proposal is reasonable in its description, but there are many missing issues that need to be addressed before any financing should be committed. See below (issues are not in any particular order of importance):
Water Quality - Other than a brief description of the current source, there appears to be no reference to water quality testing before or after construction. Who will do this and who will pay for it?
Electricity Power – from where? Reliability? Who pays and how much? Who repairs (communities?)? Who trains operators, buys or provides spare parts and materials, electricity? Is there a relatively nearby source of materials and equipment for maintenance, repair, and expansion?
Cost, Funding Sources, and Contributions– who pays for goods, materials, labor, training, etc. for system construction? It appears that community labor will be provided, but by who, and how much per family, and what tasks do they carry out? Digging trenches, hauling sand and pipes, etc. They should specify exactly what group(s) finance what aspects of the project.
Technical Operations Staff and Training- Who trains and pays the trained technical people who will design, operate and maintain the system? Who provides engineering design, operational training, construction management, O&M follow-up?
Gravity Flow Water Distribution – This apparently means a single main storage / collection tank with a gravity flow uphill source, or downhill source (groundwater, spring water, etc.) pumped up to villages with multiple tanks for gravity distribution? They need a better description of the system and who will design it, built it, maintain, get spare parts, etc.
What kind of latrines? Who builds? Who pays? who de-sludges? 9 feet deep? That's a lot of shit. How do they de-sludge from that depth? Or do they just build new ones?
Why the fuel efficient stoves? What kind, how much, who designs, etc.
Why 1160 getting water and only 481 getting latrines? Financial, technical or promotion insufficiencies? They say that all beneficiaries receive training, so why not more latrines? Cash constraints? Unwillingness to pay, etc.?
Where do the stove designs come from? Are they ground-tested? Who builds?
If community is too provide ongoing repair and maintenance, who will train them to do this?
Where do they get spare parts and the money to buy the spare parts?
Why do they say that the community is too small for support from other organizations? For example, if 1160 people get access to improved water (check later to see if it is treated, distributed, pressurized, etc.
Is the $50/month per family or person? It didn't appear to say. Probably per family.
How do they collect funds for repairs, maintenance, expansion, water treatment, etc.?
Who does the reforestation activities? Who trains and pays these people?
In general, this seems to be a fairly reasonable proposal, but it is lacking in detail with regard to responsibilities, financing, planning, and O&M.
By the way, I could not open the budget file because it was apparently mis-named as “xls.doc file. You should rename and re-post it to a common MS Word format.